Agile Novel Development
May. 29th, 2013 11:11 pmIn a previous journal entry, I described a model for selling a story idea that someone else could turn into a book or comic. I had hoped to refine it into a functional (theoretically functional, at least) sales method, but it seems that I was trying to build on a shaky foundation. Commenters took the position that most artists prefer to work as auteurs, as there's no possible way that anyone but the idea's originator could do a good job with it. Since most of us aren't professionals, it's not a surprising philosophy, although most of what we produce- fanworks- are testaments to the effectiveness of producing an idea that someone else came up with. (Hollywood is another testament.)
However, one line of thought especially jumped out at me. On my livejournal,
lalunatique shared a great article that outlined the history of Publishing and the role of the Author in the evolving sales model, ending with the assertion that the changing marketplace (online versus bookstores, grassroots over corporate publishing, etc.) will yield a new manifestation of the old concept of an Author. The article can be read here, and I recommend it as much for its exciting and punchy style as for the learning opportunity it offers. The article really got me thinking and one idea especially won my infatuation:
What if the next evolution of the Author is from a single, credited person to a team of interchangeable people?
( Function and details... )
So, do you think something like this could work? What improvements would you suggest?
However, one line of thought especially jumped out at me. On my livejournal,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
What if the next evolution of the Author is from a single, credited person to a team of interchangeable people?
( Function and details... )
So, do you think something like this could work? What improvements would you suggest?